ELNOR REPO READER TEXT MIRROR
Original path: Memory Rebuild Docs/Stage_6_Charters/E1_E2_DOC81_Scope_Policy/E1_E2_R3_Application_Report.md
Source repo: /Users/OpenClaw1/Elnor/Elnor Specs
Git branch: main
Git commit: dbaa25962edc11ab30e8d4ca1715f9ae5bf77331
Generated: 2026-06-09T01:23:58.539Z

---

# DOC81 (E1/E2) — R3 Application Report

**Date:** 2026-06-07 · **Applied by:** Claude Code (CLI) · **Target:** `DOC81_Scope_Policy_Charter_Draft.md` (R2, 2,310 lines → **R3, 2,682 lines**) · **Commission:** `E1_E2_R3_Application_Commission_Claude_Code.md` · **Instruction layer:** `E1_E2_R2_Adjudication_Card.md` (§0 headline, §1 V1–V24, §2 seeds, §3 D-R1…D-R6, §4 cluster plan) · **Review bodies:** CL = `Reviews/E1_E2_R2_Design_Review_Claude_Opus_4.8.md`; GPT = `Reviews/RT-0001_CHATGPT_CHATGPT_CONSOLIDATED_REVIEW.md`.

**Outcome:** the R2 design-review adjudication is applied in place across the four prescribed clusters, with the unified-state pipeline rebuild (V1) as cluster 1. The file is structurally valid (82 fences balanced; §0–§14 monotonic; no duplicate type declarations; `PolicyPoint` is 4-axis everywhere; stale `PolicyStampScope` references swept). All 24 V-clusters, the GPT QF1–QF17 helper pack, the six §1.3 minors, the §2 seed re-adjudications, and D-R1…D-R6 (as verified non-changes) are landed. No git. Only this report created.

**Self-report-accuracy note (commission §6).** The R2 report's check-6 claim was falsified by the CODEX audit. This report distinguishes what I *verified by sweep* (fences, brand declarations, helper-definition resolution, walked-case traces) from what is *pseudocode-level/by-convention*. Where a claim is conventional rather than mechanically verified, it says so.

---

## 1. Per-cluster changes (what / where / seam reconciliation)

### Cluster 1 — Pipeline (V1, V2, V5, V6, V8, V23, V4, V22 + V12 carrier)

**The rebuild (V1 — headline; §3.0 ≈L583–L696, §3.2 ≈L840–L975).** `PolicyPoint` is now the **four capability axes only** (`content_fidelity, locality, learning_scope, mutation_authority`); `disclosure_class` left `PolicyPoint`/`BOTTOM`/`TOP`/`meetPoints`/`leqPoint`. Added `interface PolicyEffectiveState { point, disclosure_vector, … }` (L649), `meetPolicyState`/`meetAllStates`, `finalizeDisclosureAndCoherence` (derives the scalar **once**, then `makeCoherent` last), and `disclosureVectorCeilingFor` (projects a scalar-only source to a vector bound). The disclosure CHAIN (`LAT.disclosure`) stays — it still powers `deriveDisclosureClass`, `meetDisclosureVectors`, the V19 vector order, and coherence. V1 design note + two lints (`policy.disclosure_class_present_on_policy_point`, `policy.policy_state_point_and_vector_met_separately`) at L692.

> **Seam reconciliation (V1 — GPT §15 × CL B.3, the highest-risk merge).** GPT shipped a `PolicyEffectiveState` object + pipeline-function names (`meetDecisionInputs`/`applyScopeFloor`/…/`finalizeDisclosureAndCoherence`); CL shipped the 4-axis `PolicyPoint` semantics + `disclosureVectorCeilingFor`. I adopted **GPT's state object + function names** as the spine and **CL's point semantics + projection** as the algebra. The reconciliation rule I derived and applied: *every meet input that can carry disclosure (floor `max_disclosure_vector`, domain `contribution_disclosure_vector`, sticky prior `effective_disclosure_vector`) carries it as a VECTOR, so they meet into the one vector with no projection; only a residual scalar-only source uses `disclosureVectorCeilingFor`.* The scalar is derived exactly once at step 6 and nothing after may change a disclosure value (the CODEX R2-B1 invariant is preserved and now structural). This makes the leak family (A-B1/Q1/Q4 + the CODEX obligation bug) **unrepresentable**, not patched. `MemoryPolicyDecision` keeps its declared 5-axis shape; its scalar is consistency-guarded against its vector at step 1 (V10), never independently consumed by the meet.

**Other cluster-1 edits.**
- **V2 domain crosswalk (§4.6.2, `domainContribution` L1756).** CL's `LVL_CONTENT/LOCALITY/LEARNING/MUTATION/DISCLOSE` maps + per-action axis selection (export→`v.export`, etc.; internal actions unconstrained by egress axes; `source_authority` stays DOC82). Emits `PolicyEffectiveState` with `disclosure_vector: disclosureVectorCeilingFor(LVL_DISCLOSE[v.disclosure])`. Constants marked seed (§13.6). *Seam: GPT Q1 wanted a contribution disclosure vector; CL had the level maps. Merged — the maps produce the vector, closing "domain disclosure overwritten at finalize."*
- **V4a empty-applicable internal baseline (§3.2 step 1c, L915).** Empty + `isInternalAction` + `request.principal == object_owner_principal` + no R-1 basis ⇒ `domainBaselineDecision` (reason `policy.domain_profile_only_internal_baseline`), NOT a fifth hard-block. Hard block retained for egress/write/learn/delegate/carryover/cross-principal. *Seam: GPT B1's refined fix over CL's framing.*
- **V4b action-aware floor (§3.2 step 3, L935; §4.6 rule-3).** EGRESS actions get the rule-3 floor; INTERNAL actions floor only on the R-1 four (`conservatism_floor_basis.r1_qualifying`). Else-branch comment makes explicit that cross-matter relevance is a DAMS-contamination concern (§4.4), never a floor. Lint `policy.internal_use_floor_raised_without_qualifying_basis` (degradation counts, not just hard blocks).
- **V12 carrier (§2.4 `conservatism_floor_basis` L396).** `{ r1_qualifying, flags, disambiguation_cause? }` added to `ScopeResolutionResult`, sourced from V12's preserved (not max-ranked) flags — the field step 3 reads.
- **V5 restamp_reeval (§3.2 step 4 L945; §3.4 prose L1272).** `mode='restamp_reeval'` skips sticky and clamps to `MIN(root ceiling, current scope floor)` + ceiling vector. §3.4 names the mode + QF10's resources-only batch guard.
- **V6 crosswalk consumption (§3.2 step 0c; `EffectiveMemoryPolicy` L857–L859).** Crosswalk row resolved by `relation_to_destination`; dispositions enforced; `combined_floor = meetFloors([scope, crosswalk])`; `destination_crosswalk_ref?` + `egress_attestation_required` carried.
- **V8 egress applicable check (§3.2 step 1b, L923).** Split from structural 0b: post-filter, ≥1 *applicable* destination-matching decision required.
- **V22 action/exposure/relation (§3.2 prose L974).** Internal injection/attach = internal retrieve path (never `carryover`); egress actions outbound-only; internal relations never on egress decisions + 2 lints/2 fixtures.
- **V23 action predicate (§3.2 step 7; §4.7 `evaluateActionPredicate` L1863 + `ActionPermissionResult`).** Closure + predicate gate; outcome carried on `EffectiveMemoryPolicy.action_permission_result`.

### Cluster 2 — Disclosure (V3, V9, V11, V21)

- **V3 merged `deriveDisclosureClass` (§4.2, L1468).** Exact card tree; **never falls through to `full`**. *Seam: CL A-B2 (over-class — `generic_reason_only` laundering to full) × GPT №7 (under-class — source-title/exact-count read as generic). Merged into one function: `source_title ∨ count=exact ∨ summary=full_reason → full`; `reason_summary ∨ summary∈{generic_reason_only, redacted_reason} → redacted_summary`; else `generic_safe_label_only`.*
- **V9 typed obligation union (§3.3, `PolicyObligationParametersByKind` L1050).** GPT Q5 parameter-map: every `PolicyObligationKind` has a typed contract; `hide_existence`/`show_generic_existence_only` are now concrete members. CL A-M4 folded: `require_safe_label → disclosureVectorCeilingFor('generic_safe_label_only')` added to `OBLIGATION_DISCLOSURE_VECTOR_CEILING`.
- **V11 (§4.2 `meetDisclosureVectors` L1432; §3.4 `PolicyStampInvalidation.notice_disposition` L1259; §9 `PolicyUIExport.scope_items` per-action L2455).** Meet now PRESERVES `count_bucket_policy_ref`/`reason_summary_template_ref` (carried iff host capability survives AND all vectors agree; conflict ⇒ drop-to-none, fail-closed). `notice_disposition` with `user_visible_summary_ref?` forbidden on `no_notice`. Per-action `disclosure_class`+`disclosure_vector` on UI-export scope items (ui_disclose may be more open than export). *Seam: GPT №8 (refs dropped) × CL A-S4 (per-action). Merged — refs preserved AND surfaced per action; top-level disclosure is the most-restrictive summary.*
- **V21 wall one-liners (§4.2, L1514).** Three non-gating, dormant-for-solo invariants + lints: coverage-proof excludes walled scopes; internal/inspector labels forbidden for firewalled material; cause-parameterized disambiguation floor. Honors **D-R5** (encoded as contracts, not built/gating).

### Cluster 3 — Quant + lifecycle (V7, V10, V13–V20)

- **V7 sticky-prior cache key (§6.6, L861/EffectivePolicyCacheKey).** `meet_mode` + `sticky_prior_effective_policy_hash?` on the cache key (+ `…_ref?`/`…_hash?` on `EffectiveMemoryPolicy`). Lint `cache.effective_policy_reused_across_different_sticky_prior`. *GPT Q3 (CL missed it).*
- **V10 (§3.2 meet L969).** `try/catch (PolicyLatticeError) ⇒ blockedBottomState` (fail-closed); per-axis `LAT[axis].isMember` guards (step 1, F1); scalar/vector mismatch guard (`d.disclosure_class != deriveDisclosureClass(d.disclosure_vector) ⇒ forceBottomDisclosure`).
- **V13 persistence markers (§2.4 `DOC81PersistenceKind` L453).** The six derived per-request objects (`ScopeResolutionResult`, `ScopeBoundary`, `EffectiveMemoryPolicy`, `PolicyMembraneDecision`, `PolicyCappedDAMSInput`, `PolicyEvaluationContext`) each carry `persistence_kind: 'derived_projection'` + `canonical_source_refs` + `rebuild_key`. **Per-object choice: all six are `derived_projection`** (each is rebuildable from its sources; none is the audit-durable record — those are the stamp/restamp/cluster/cascade/legal-hold/governance/exclusion/topic-risk objects). Honors **D-R2** (local marker, no E0-named base).
- **V14 capability-obligation emission (§3.3, L1127).** Emission lint `policy.capability_obligation_contradicts_axis` + consumer-precedence (blocking obligation governs over the axis). Honors **D-R4** (no runtime step-5b).
- **V15 cluster (§2.1 `ScopeEquivalenceCluster` L238).** `lifecycle_state` + `equivalence_generation_id` + `spanning_selection_algorithm='maximum_bottleneck_spanning_tree'` + `cluster_confidence_formula` + contradiction disposition. *Seam: CL cluster-lifecycle × GPT QF5 spanning determinism — merged; invalidate on any spanning-binding change; min-edge over the selected tree.*
- **V16 cascade (§5.1, `cascadeComplete` L1937).** Freeze-completion gate (`pre_fanout_freeze_complete`); `cascadeComplete()` derived formula (QF11); `published_view_closure='transitive_until_fixpoint'` (nested views); `SupportEdgeStatus` 3-state + `lastActiveSupportEdgeLost` returning `lost|not_lost|indeterminate_fail_closed` (QF12). *Seam: CL A2-S8/A2-S9 lifecycle/TOCTOU × GPT QF11/QF12 — merged.*
- **V17 QF pack.** QF1 `requiredScopeConfidenceComponents` (§2.4); QF2 `computeCoverage` (§2.6); QF3 `evaluateThreshold` + `ThresholdPolarity` (§4.6.3, L1798); QF4 contamination `minimum_measurement_confidence` (§4.4); QF6 `UnitInterval`+`asUnitInterval` (§3.0, L583); QF7 zero-bucket⇒coverage-proof (§2.6); QF8 `topicMatchAmbiguity` (§7.1); QF10 `validateQuotaEnvelope`+resources-only guard (§6.7); QF15 `CanonicalHashSpec` (§6.6, L2186).
- **V18 collection (§7.1, `evaluateCollectionDisposition` L2283).** Executable disposition selector + `governance_resolution_state` (`GovernanceResolutionState`; unresolved ⇒ defer-fail-closed) + `topicMatchAmbiguity` formula.
- **V19 restamp MFC (§3.4, L1230).** `issued_memory_flow_certificate_ref?` (optional, post-issuance) + invariant ("REQUIRED once restamp_disposition commits") + `DisclosureVectorCeilingComparison` (QF13 vector partial order). Honors **D-R1** (no second `PolicyStampRestampIssuance` object).
- **V20 schema-integrity batch.** `PolicyStampScope` collapsed into `PolicyStamp.scope_items` (L1192; Owner Map line 83 repoint note §14.3.R3; `PolicyStampScopeRef` retired §0); `ConservatismFloorEffect.effect_id` (§4.6.1); `DomainPolicyThresholdsRef` (§0 + §4.6.3, with `domain_profile_id` FK); legal-hold branded `hold_ref: LegalHoldStateRef` + destructive/non-destructive split (`LEGAL_HOLD_EFFECT_CLASS`, §6.1); `contextCompatible` defined (§3.0, after `PolicyEvaluationContext`); `principal_scope` sentinel (already at §2.4); conditional `safe_label_vocabulary_version` (§6.6).

### Cluster 4 — Bookkeeping

- **§13.6 re-seed (L≈2588).** THRESHOLD split — `THRESHOLD_FALLBACK_NO_PROFILE = {1.0, 0.0}` (no-profile only) + `THRESHOLD_SHIPPED_DEFAULT_PROFILE = {0.85, 0.70}` (operational, seed); `local_file_export` floor → `normal_policy_check` + attestation retained; **depth stays 16 (D-R3)**; new R3 seed rows (contamination min-confidence, topic ambiguity band, LVL_* maps).
- **§13.7 (L2608) — R3 minors + V24 forward notes + R3 declines.** The six minors (per-object CAS race attribution; fixture-name alignment; bracket consistency; attestation compose = fail-safe OR; `user_instruction_policy_bound` invariant; unknown exposure-context fails closed). V24 forward notes (default.ordinary profile obligation; delegation envelope → DOC11; honest valid-time scoping per CL A2-M6). D-R1…D-R6 stated as verified non-changes.
- **§11 roll-up (L≈2516–2519).** NI-1 family extended: `fixture.property.monotone_down_under_add_and_remove` now exercises the disclosure axis (V1); added `fixture.property.disclosure_monotone_down_under_floor_domain_and_prior`. R3-additions index paragraph.
- **§0 brand block.** `DomainPolicyThresholdsRef` added (owned); `E0EgressAttestationRef` noted as E0-referenced (not owned); `PolicyStampScopeRef` retired-tombstone.
- **Header/footer.** Title → "R3"; document-status → "R3 — R2 design-review adjudication applied; awaiting fidelity audit + delta re-check."; §14.3.R3 discharge block; footer → R3.

---

## 2. Walked-case outcomes (commission check 10 — traced against the FINAL text)

1. **CL scenario (d) — R-1 internal cross-matter retrieve (§3.2 step 3, L935–L939).** Internal `retrieve`, same-principal, cross-matter, no R-1 qualifying basis. `isEgressAction(retrieve)=false` AND `conservatism_floor_basis.r1_qualifying=false` ⇒ the step-3 `if` is false ⇒ **no floor raise**; relevance is left to DAMS contamination ranking. **OUTCOME: PASS — not floored to reference-only** (the R-1 ruling holds; CL A-B3 satisfied).
2. **GPT empty-applicable internal case (§3.2 step 1c, L917–L920).** Internal action, `request.principal == object_owner_principal`, empty applicable set, no R-1 basis ⇒ `applicable = [domainBaselineDecision(request)]` (reason `policy.domain_profile_only_internal_baseline`). **OUTCOME: PASS — domain-profile-only baseline, NOT a hard block** (hard block reserved for egress/write/learn/delegate/carryover/cross-principal; GPT B1 satisfied).
3. **CL scenario (e) — R-2 silent restamp (§3.2 step 4, L945–L947; §3.4 L1272).** A transient floor that lowered an axis is lifted; restamp runs `meet_v2(…, mode='restamp_reeval')` ⇒ sticky skipped (no re-pin to the prior lower value), candidate clamped to `MIN(root ceiling, current scope floor)` + ceiling vector ⇒ the axis rises back to the ceiling. §3.4 restamp authority makes it fully silent/autonomous (human only for firewalled). **OUTCOME: PASS — autonomous restore-up-to-ceiling reachable** (CL A-B4 satisfied; QF10 keeps batch approval resources-only).

---

## 3. Regression + acceptance results (commission §5)

| # | Check | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No E0 contract re-declared | **PASS** — 0 local `type X = Brand` for `ReasonCodeId`/`PolicyGenerationId`/`DomainProfileId`/`EffectiveStateGenerationId`/`MemoryFlowCertificateId`/`E0OutboundDestinationClass`; V2 maps reference E0 §2.2; `E0EgressAttestationRef` added as *referenced*, not owned. |
| 2 | No retired name | **PASS** — no `ask_user`/`ScopeMembrane`/scalar-decision reintroduction (only guard/lint mentions). R3 *adds* a retirement: `PolicyStampScopeRef` (V20) with lint `schema.policy_stamp_scope_ref_used`. |
| 3 | §9 downward-only | **PASS** — `AvailabilityDisposition` stays DOC86-owned (not carried); `import_graph.upward_schema_import_to_policy` guard intact; M8 confirms reverse is EC-routed command. DOC81 exports `disclosure_class`/vector/safe-label constraints only. |
| 4 | §7.3 ↔ §14.2 consistent | **PASS (unchanged by R3)** — R3 did not touch the §7.3 PropA reconciliation table or the §14.2 landings; the CODEX-fixed row-body mapping (NEW-01/02, V15-01..06, DSPY-TARGETS) is intact. |
| 5 | One-owner incl. F7/F9 | **PASS** — `ContaminationRiskMeasurement` stays `schema_owner:'DOC84'` (F9); `AvailabilityDisposition` stays DOC86 (F7); R3 added no cross-owner schema. |
| 6 | Zero `\| string` escapes + zero bare primary IDs (S-1 persistence) | **PASS** — the 3 `\| string` hits are a lint name + two "escape REMOVED" doc mentions, not union escapes. New R3 primary IDs all branded (`DomainPolicyThresholdsRef`, `ConservatismFloorEffectRef`, `LegalHoldClearance.hold_ref→LegalHoldStateRef`). Bare `: string` hits are non-primary generation counters / foreign refs / keys (audit carve-out). **Observation (pre-R3, not introduced here):** `RelationTraversalExecutionTrace.budget_ref: string` has an available brand `RelationTraversalBudgetRef`; left unchanged to avoid editing non-R3 lines — flagged for the fidelity audit. |
| 7 | Gate+lint+fixture triple per new invariant | **PASS** — spot-verified each V-item carries a lint + fixture (restamp_reeval, capability_obligation_contradicts_axis, freeze-gate, coverage-walled-exclusion, sticky-cache, mismatch guard, etc.). Listed per-cluster above. |
| 8 | Golden + NI-1 disclosure-axis extension | **PASS** — `fixture.property.monotone_down_under_add_and_remove` now exercises `disclosure_vector`; `fixture.property.disclosure_monotone_down_under_floor_domain_and_prior` added; the golden cascade/legal-hold fixtures intact. |
| 9 | §0/§13/§14 counts + header | **PASS** — header/status/footer → R3; §0 brand added; §13.6 re-seeded; §13.7 added; §14.3.R3 discharge block added. |
| 10 | §1-bis boundary audit + 3 walked cases | **PASS** — R-1 four-basis exhaustiveness holds (cases d + empty-applicable traced PASS); R-2 silent restamp traced PASS; R-3 surface-keyed notices intact (§4.2); R-5 principal keys mandatory (`principal_ref`/`principal_scope`/`object_owner_principal`). |
| 11 | Meta-checklist (5 clauses) | **PASS** — see §4 below. Two real gaps found and fixed during the sweep (`unique()` undefined; `evaluateActionPredicate` undefined + a `LAT[ax]` key-mismatch). |

---

## 4. Meta-checklist sweep (commission check 11 — the acceptance criterion)

- **Every table has a consumer in the pipeline.** ✔ `LVL_*` maps → `domainContribution` (step 2); `OBLIGATION_DISCLOSURE_VECTOR_CEILING` → step 5; `LEGAL_HOLD_EFFECT_CLASS` → the gate; `THRESHOLD_*` → `evaluateThreshold`; `COUNT_MODE_RANK`/`SUMMARY_FIDELITY_RANK` → `meetDisclosureVectors`; `DISCLOSURE_ALLOWS` → coherence/lint; `PolicyObligationParametersByKind` → the mapped union; `ACTION_PERMISSION_PREDICATE` → `evaluateActionPredicate`.
- **Every metric has a formula.** ✔ confidence (`requiredScopeConfidenceComponents` + min-of-required); coverage (`computeCoverage`); threshold (`evaluateThreshold` + polarity); contamination (`minimum_measurement_confidence` gate); topic ambiguity (`topicMatchAmbiguity`); cluster confidence (min-edge over max-bottleneck tree); cascade completion (`cascadeComplete`); last-edge (`lastActiveSupportEdgeLost`); quota (`validateQuotaEnvelope`); action predicate (`evaluateActionPredicate`); all ranges via `UnitInterval`. **Fixed during sweep:** `computeCoverage` referenced an undefined `unique()` → inlined `[...new Set()]`; `evaluateActionPredicate` was called (step 7) but undefined → defined it + `ActionPermissionResult`, and corrected a `LAT[ax]` long-name/short-name key mismatch via an explicit axis→chain map.
- **Every hash has a canonicalization.** ✔ `CanonicalHashSpec` (QF15) governs every `ContentHash` input (`compiled_policy_evaluator_hash`, `contributing_decision_hash`, `obligation_set_hash`, `sticky_prior_effective_policy_hash`); defers to E0 §8.5 where present.
- **Every stateful object has transition rules.** ✔ `ScopeEquivalenceCluster` (active/invalidated/recomputing + generation bump); `CascadingSourceInvalidationRun` (freeze→5 planes→derived complete); `LegalHoldState` (held/released); `PolicyStamp` (lifecycle_state); `CollectionSuppressionEvaluation` (disposition derivation); `LastActiveSupportEdgeEvaluation` (3-state).
- **Every optional field has a presence condition.** ✔ `issued_memory_flow_certificate_ref?` (required once restamp commits); `user_visible_summary_ref?` (forbidden on `no_notice`); `safe_label_vocabulary_version?` (present iff label-bearing); `sticky_prior_effective_policy_ref?/hash?` (present iff sticky prior exists); `manual_approval_semantics?` (required for restamp_batch); `binding_constraint?` (present iff attribution recorded; must cover every tightened axis); `action_permission_result?` (present on every assembled non-blocked result).

**Residual violators:** none in the executable TS. **One honest scoping note:** the normative `meet_v2` is written as **pseudocode** (Python-style `#` comments) and names operations (`domainBaselineDecision`, `rootCeilingItems`, `clampPointDown`, `FLOOR_EFFECT`, `priorState`, `resolveObligations`, `isInForce`) whose behavior is stated in adjacent prose/comments but which are not separately TS-defined — this is the charter's established convention for the meet (carried from R1/R2), not an R3 regression. The compilable TS helpers (the QF pack, lattice, disclosure, predicate) all resolve.

---

## 5. Full mapping table

### 5.1 Blocking + substantive clusters V1–V24

| V | Disposition | Landing (§ / ~line) |
|---|---|---|
| V1 unified policy state | applied (headline) | §3.0 `PolicyEffectiveState` L649 + design note L692; §3.2 meet L840–L975 |
| V2 domain 9→5 crosswalk | applied | §4.6.2 `domainContribution` L1756; consumed step 2 |
| V3 `deriveDisclosureClass` both directions | applied (merged fn) | §4.2 L1468 |
| V4 R-1 in the meet (a empty-applicable / b action-aware floor) | applied (both) | §3.2 step 1c L915; step 3 L935; §4.6 rule-3 |
| V5 `restamp_reeval` mode | applied | §3.2 step 4 L945; §3.4 prose L1272; §6.7 QF10 guard |
| V6 crosswalk consumed | applied | §3.2 step 0c; `EffectiveMemoryPolicy` L857 |
| V7 sticky prior in cache key | applied | §6.6 `EffectivePolicyCacheKey` L861; `EffectiveMemoryPolicy` L860 |
| V8 egress applicable precondition | applied | §3.2 step 1b L923 |
| V9 typed obligation union | applied | §3.3 `PolicyObligationParametersByKind` L1050 + A-M4 ceiling |
| V10 lattice-error wrap + mismatch guard | applied | §3.2 step 1 L911 + catch L969 |
| V11 disclosure refs / notice / per-action export | applied | §4.2 `meetDisclosureVectors` L1432; §3.4 `notice_disposition` L1259; §9 L2455 |
| V12 floor-basis flags carrier | applied | §2.4 `conservatism_floor_basis` L396 |
| V13 `persistence_kind` markers (6 objects) | applied (all `derived_projection`) | §2.4 marker L453 + 6 schemas |
| V14 capability-obligation emission lint + precedence | applied | §3.3 L1127 (D-R4 honored) |
| V15 cluster lifecycle + spanning tree + contradiction | applied | §2.1 L238 |
| V16 cascade freeze + `cascadeComplete` + nested views + 3-state edge | applied | §5.1 L1937 + L1990 |
| V17 QF helper pack (QF1–QF17) | applied | §2.4/§2.6/§3.0/§4.4/§4.6.3/§6.6/§6.7/§7.1 (see §1 cluster 3) |
| V18 `evaluateCollectionDisposition` + `governance_resolution_state` | applied | §7.1 L2283 |
| V19 restamp issued-MFC + invariant + vector ceiling cmp | applied | §3.4 L1230 (D-R1 honored) |
| V20 schema-integrity batch | applied (all items) | §3.4 collapse L1192; §4.6.1 effect_id; §4.6.3 thresholds-ref; §6.1 legal-hold; §3.0 contextCompatible; §6.6 vocab cond |
| V21 wall one-liners (×3) | applied (non-gating, D-R5) | §4.2 L1514; §2.6; §2.4 |
| V22 action/exposure/relation | applied | §3.2 prose L974 |
| V23 action closure + predicate gate | applied | §3.2 step 7; §4.7 `evaluateActionPredicate` L1863 |
| V24 forward notes | applied (carried, not built) | §13.7 L2612 |

GPT QF cross-reference: QF1→V17/§2.4; QF2/QF7→V17/§2.6; QF3→V17/§4.6.3; QF4→V17/§4.4; QF5→V15; QF6→V17/§3.0; QF8→V17/§7.1; QF9→V18; QF10→V5/§6.7; QF11/QF12→V16; QF13/QF14→V19; QF15→V17/§6.6; QF16→V20 (conditional vocab version); QF17→V23.

### 5.2 §1.3 minors (six)

| Minor | Disposition | Landing |
|---|---|---|
| Race attribution → EC per-object CAS | applied | §13.7 + §3.6 `epoch_version` CAS; lint `policy.restamp_cascade_race_without_per_object_cas` |
| Fixture-name alignment | applied | §13.7; R3 fixtures use `fixture.<area>.<behavior>` |
| Bracket consistency | applied | §13.7; `Array<T>` for multi-field, `T[]` for scalar/id lists |
| Attestation compose = fail-safe OR | applied | §13.7; `egress_attestation_required` OR (L858); lint `egress.attestation_requirement_composed_as_and` |
| `user_instruction_policy_bound` invariant | applied | §3.0 `PolicyEvaluationContext` L724; lint `policy.user_instruction_widened_effective_axis` |
| Unknown exposure-context fails closed | applied | §13.7; lint `policy.unknown_exposure_context_not_fail_closed` + fixture |

### 5.3 §2 seed re-adjudications

| Seed | Disposition | Landing |
|---|---|---|
| THRESHOLD split (1.0/0.0 fallback-only + 0.85/0.7 operational) | applied | §4.6.3 consts L1764–L1766; §13.6 two rows |
| `local_file_export` floor → `normal_policy_check` + attestation | applied | §13.6 row; §7.4/§4.6.4 (already treats as egress) |
| Traversal depth stays 16 | applied (D-R3) | §13.6 row; §8 budget |
| Contamination `minimum_measurement_confidence` ≈0.60 | applied (seed) | §4.4; §13.6 row |
| Topic ambiguity band 0.20 / admit 0.70 | applied (seed) | §7.1; §13.6 row |
| 9→5 `LVL_*` map cell values | applied (seed) | §4.6.2; §13.6 row |

### 5.4 R3 declines D-R1…D-R6 (verified NON-changes)

| D | Verified non-change | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| D-R1 no second `PolicyStampRestampIssuance` object | confirmed | §3.4 uses optional `issued_memory_flow_certificate_ref?` + invariant (L1230); no second object exists |
| D-R2 no `E0DerivedProjection` E0-named base | confirmed | §2.4 local `DOC81PersistenceKind` marker (L453); no E0-named base added |
| D-R3 depth stays 16 (not 8) | confirmed | §8 budget = 16; §13.6 row notes GPT's 8 declined |
| D-R4 no runtime step-5b obligation reconciliation | confirmed | §3.2 step 5 tightens disclosure vector only; capability via V14 emission lint (L1127) |
| D-R5 wall items non-gating | confirmed | §4.2 V21 (L1514) are invariants+lints, dormant-for-solo, explicitly non-gating |
| D-R6 CL B.3 adopted NOW (not deferred) | confirmed | V1 is the headline rebuild (§3.0/§3.2), not a later pass |

**R1-card declines D1–D12** remain binding and untouched (no reintroduction; verified by the no-retired-name + one-owner + downward-only sweeps).

---

## 6. Status

R3 applied across all four clusters; file structurally valid (2,682 lines; 82 balanced fences; §0–§14 monotonic). Two real defects (the `unique()` and `evaluateActionPredicate` formula gaps) were caught by the meta-checklist sweep and fixed before this report — they are reported above rather than asserted away. **Next per commission:** architect review → automated CODEX application-fidelity audit (which also audits this report) → NI-1 property gate + §3.2 delta re-check → `Ratification.md` → discharge sweep. Files uncommitted (architect commits).