09F_Final_Integration_Review_Prompt.md
Memory Rebuild Docs/Memory Rebuild Review Packs/Archived Memory Rebuild Zips/DOC80_Memory_Control_Plane_PreSpec_Review_Pack_v1_0_2026-05-25/09F_Final_Integration_Review_Prompt.md
ELNOR REPO READER TEXT MIRROR Original path: Memory Rebuild Docs/Memory Rebuild Review Packs/Archived Memory Rebuild Zips/DOC80_Memory_Control_Plane_PreSpec_Review_Pack_v1_0_2026-05-25/09F_Final_Integration_Review_Prompt.md Source repo: /Users/OpenClaw1/Elnor/Elnor Specs Git branch: main Git commit: dbaa25962edc11ab30e8d4ca1715f9ae5bf77331 Generated: 2026-06-09T01:23:58.539Z --- # Round F Prompt — Final Integration Review ## Assignment Use this only after Rounds A–E have been adjudicated and the documents have been patched. This is the only omnibus review. ## Required attachments All files in the patched review pack. ## Core question Is the patched review pack coherent enough to draft the real DAMS V5 / Memory Control Plane spec and the separate Flatten-and-Unify execution plan? ## Issues to attack 1. Are terms used consistently across all documents? 2. Are any concepts duplicated under different names? 3. Are there remaining phantom seams? 4. Are owner boundaries clear enough for a spec drafter? 5. Do the worked examples still classify cleanly after patches? 6. Are research requirements carried into the spec outline and not left as prose? 7. Does the flattening plan target the architecture actually described in the concept model? 8. Is anything missing before drafting the operative spec? ## Required output ```text 1. Proceed / do not proceed disposition 2. Cross-document contradiction list 3. Remaining terminology fixes 4. Missing schemas/contracts 5. Missing fixtures 6. Final changes required before drafting DAMS V5 7. Final changes required before drafting Flatten-and-Unify Plan V2 ```