DOC73_V1_6_DEFERRAL_INVENTORY_R1.1.md
Current Specs/DOC73/DOC73 Helper Home and Deferral List/DOC73_V1_6_DEFERRAL_INVENTORY_R1.1.md
ELNOR REPO READER TEXT MIRROR
Original path: Current Specs/DOC73/DOC73 Helper Home and Deferral List/DOC73_V1_6_DEFERRAL_INVENTORY_R1.1.md
Source repo: /Users/OpenClaw1/Elnor/Elnor Specs
Git branch: main
Git commit: dbaa25962edc11ab30e8d4ca1715f9ae5bf77331
Generated: 2026-06-09T01:23:58.539Z
---
# DOC73 V1.6 Deferral Inventory R1.1
**Date produced:** 2026-05-02 (R1); 2026-05-04 (R1.1 CSA extraction patch)
**Generated from:** `DOC73_V1_6_INVENTORY_ADJUDICATION_CARD_V4` + `OPA_V3_10.md`
**Status:** R1.1 — CSA extraction applied: DOC2_CSA_INTEGRATION_REVIEW marked SUPERSEDED; MECH4_PROPOSAL_FIDELITY_REVIEW description updated for post-extraction state; new DOC73_TO_DOC72_CSA_INTERFACE_REVIEW V1.6.1 item added
**Owner:** Will (architect)
**Folder:** `ECQ Development/DOC73 R1.6 Build/` — V1.6 release-wave working folder
**R1.1 changes from R1 (per architect CSA extraction prompt 2026-05-04):**
- `DOC2_CSA_INTEGRATION_REVIEW` (§1.2): marked SUPERSEDED — DOC73 V1.6 no longer absorbs CSA; the question "does CSA absorption obviate DOC2 integration?" no longer applies at V1.6 level (CSA stays in DOC72; DOC2 architectural fate is independent of V1.6 release wave)
- `MECH4_PROPOSAL_FIDELITY_REVIEW` (§1.2): description updated to reflect post-extraction state (V1.6 Mechanism 4 has additional divergences from proposal: CSA orchestration removed entirely; consumer contract pointer added)
- NEW `DOC73_TO_DOC72_CSA_INTERFACE_REVIEW` (§1.2): added per architect CSA extraction prompt — when DOC72 ships session-orientation orchestration, confirm DOC73 V1.6's RecentActivityRollup producer/consumer contract aligns with DOC72's consumer-side architecture; architect preference for tier_3_minimal_orientation semantics (per Q-3-A4-7 historical record) carries forward
---
## Purpose
Consolidate every V4 adjudication-card decision that does NOT ship in V1.6 into a single inventory. For each item: source citation, deferral target, reason, OP-A row that tracks it (or `MISSING` flag), dependencies, and complexity estimate. This is the V1.6 release-wave "what's not in scope and why" reference.
## Format
Each item: single-line entry per task spec:
```
ITEM_NAME | source: V4 §X.Y | target: V1.X | reason | OP-A: OBL-XXX-01 | depends_on: ... | complexity: small/medium/large
```
OP-A row references against `OPA_V3_8.md` (same folder). Items where OP-A row is `MISSING` need OP-A backfill before V1.6 ships per §6 of this inventory.
---
## §1. V1.6.1 Candidates — Rapid-Patch Lane (per V4 §0.5 TIGHTENED)
V1.6.1 entry conditions per V4 §0.5.2 require ALL 8 conditions: no INV changes; no canonical schema changes; no new write paths; no new routing/ranking; no new owner-doc obligations; targeted patch-card review; §28 worked-example suite passes; storage/reason-code/retention registries exist. **Each V1.6.1 candidate ships only with a Safe Patch Audit per V4-§0.5-2 (V4-AT-39).**
### 1.1 SAFE V1.6.1 candidates (per V4 §0.5.1 SAFE list — V4-EXPANDED)
```text
ADDITIONAL_LEGAL_PROFILE_STARTERS | source: V4 §6 + §0.5.1 + §3.5 J group | target: V1.6.1 | reason: V1.6 ships 4 essential legal profile starters; an additional 8 are V1.6.1 polish | OP-A: MISSING (no OP-A row for the 8-starter polish; tracked under §6 V1.6.1 candidates list narrative only) | depends_on: V1.6 4-profile model shipped | complexity: small
SEARCH_UI_REFINEMENTS_NO_ROUTER_CHANGES | source: V4 §6 + §0.5.1 | target: V1.6.1 | reason: UI polish over already-shipped Search Router semantics; cannot change Router behavior | OP-A: MISSING (search UI polish is below OP-A row granularity; covered by Q Dashboard backlog) | depends_on: OBL-D24-V16-SEARCH-ROUTER-01 closed | complexity: small
READ_ONLY_SUGGESTED_BINDINGS_DISPLAY | source: V4 §6 + §3.6 K.23 + §0.5.1 | target: V1.6.1 | reason: V1.6 ships read-only suggestion logic; V1.6.1 adds polished display surface; full write-back pattern is V1.7 (now V1.8+ per reframe) | OP-A: MISSING (V1.6.1 polish; logic side covered by OBL-D73-V16-K-LIFECYCLE-01 + OBL-D73-V16-K-BINDING-NORMALIZATION-01) | depends_on: OBL-D73-V16-K-LIFECYCLE-01, OBL-D73-V16-K-BINDING-NORMALIZATION-01 | complexity: small
FILTER_UI_OVER_V16_STRUCTURAL_FILTERS | source: V4 §6 + §3.5.5 J.5 V1.6.1 candidates list | target: V1.6.1 | reason: V1.6 ships 9 core legal filters (case_number_normalized, court_id, filing_kind, procedural_posture, filing_date, motion_type, filing_side, outcome, docket_status); V1.6.1 adds 8 polish filters: PSLRA / 9(b) status, CW count, argument-level theme, citation pattern, exhibit dependency, judge (with temporal validity), counsel (CounselAppearance), hearing metadata | OP-A: MISSING (V1.6.1 polish; V1.6 9-filter base covered implicitly by Group J implementation) | depends_on: V1.6 J.5 9-filter UI shipped | complexity: medium
```
### 1.2 V4-NEW V1.6.1 candidates (lifted from inline V4 PATCH markers)
```text
DOC2_CSA_INTEGRATION_REVIEW | SUPERSEDED 2026-05-04 by CSA extraction (architect prompt 2026-05-04) | source: originally architect triage 2026-05-03 (DOC73_V1_6_BUILD_QUESTIONS.md §11.3) | target: SUPERSEDED — no longer applies to DOC73 V1.6 since CSA absorption removed | reason: V4 / V1.6 originally absorbed CSA R2 via Mechanism 4. Architect (2026-05-04) decided CSA does not belong in DOC73 V1.6 and authorized surgical extraction. Post-extraction, DOC73 V1.6 no longer absorbs CSA; CSA stays in DOC72 as its own architectural concern. The original review question ("does CSA absorption obviate DOC2 integration?") no longer applies at V1.6 level. DOC2's architectural fate is now independent of V1.6 release wave and is DOC72/DOC2 architectural work on its own timeline. [SUPERSEDED 2026-05-04; original entry preserved for historical record per architect prompt Phase 3 deferral discipline.]
MECH4_PROPOSAL_FIDELITY_REVIEW | source: architect query 2026-05-04 (post-R1.0 freeze; surfaced via review of DOC73_PROPOSAL_SECTION_6_4_MECHANISM_4_ROLLUP_V1.md); updated 2026-05-04 per CSA extraction | target: V1.6.1 review item (STILL ACTIVE post-extraction) | reason: Architect surfaced the original Mechanism 4 V1 proposal (DOC73-authored 2026-04-29; 442 lines) and asked whether it was folded into V1.6. V1.6 Artifact 1 §16.2A.1 explicitly cites the proposal as origin spec, but several proposal features were modified (storage format markdown→JSONL canonical per V3-N-2; cadence model 14-day-daily replaced with hourly+weekly+monthly+session_summary) or dropped (PBE feedback loop §3.4; explicit token budgets per cadence; rollup_synthesis_model named knob; worked markdown example). Companion section §11 of `DOC73_V1_6_CSA_INTEGRATION_TRACE_R0.1.md` provides line-by-line proposal→V1.6 fidelity check with 6 architect-decision questions (Q-MECH4-1 through Q-MECH4-6). Q-MECH4-2 (cadence model: 14-day daily essential vs V1.6's hourly+weekly+monthly OK?) is the load-bearing question; if architect decides 14-day daily is essential, V1.6.1 candidate to add it back as a 4th durable cadence. [POST-EXTRACTION UPDATE 2026-05-04: After CSA extraction, V1.6 Mechanism 4 diverges from the V1 proposal in additional ways: CSA orchestration scaffolding removed entirely (CSAInjectionTierPolicy + injection tiers + orientation wrapper type); consumer contract pointer added per OBL-D73-RECENT-ACTIVITY-ROLLUP-CONSUMER-CONTRACT-01. The Q-MECH4-* questions in CSA_INTEGRATION_TRACE §11 remain active for architect review.] | OP-A: MISSING (review item) | depends_on: architect review of DOC73_V1_6_CSA_INTEGRATION_TRACE_R0.1.md §11; estimated 1-2 hours | complexity: small-to-medium (review only; likely few spec changes; possible V1.6.1 patches if Q-MECH4-2 + Q-MECH4-5 dispositions = re-add)
DOC73_TO_DOC72_CSA_INTERFACE_REVIEW | source: architect CSA extraction prompt 2026-05-04 | target: V1.6.1 review item (paired with DOC72's eventual CSA design ship) | reason: When DOC72 ships session-orientation orchestration (whatever form CSA takes in DOC72), confirm DOC73 V1.6's RecentActivityRollup producer/consumer contract aligns with DOC72's consumer-side architecture. The DOC73 V1.6 contract is: schema + writer + cadence + invariants (Artifact 1 §16); consumer-side orchestration deferred to DOC72. The interface review verifies that DOC72's session-orientation design can consume the RecentActivityRollup contract DOC73 produces. Architect preference for `tier_3_minimal_orientation` semantics (inject at session start once, not per-query; per Q-3-A4-7 historical record in BUILD_QUESTIONS §11.1) carries forward as a recorded preference for whenever DOC72 designs this. If DOC72's design differs significantly, RecentActivityRollup schema or writer contract may need adjustments; tracked as contingent V1.6.1 work. | OP-A: MISSING (cross-doc review item; not a V1.6 feature obligation; tracked here pending DOC72 ship) | depends_on: DOC72 session-orientation orchestration design (timeline TBD); not blocking R1.0 freeze of DOC73 V1.6 | complexity: small (review only; possible small Artifact 1 §16 schema additions if DOC72 needs fields DOC73 doesn't currently expose)
LEGAL_HUBNESS_MITIGATION | source: V4 §3.5.4.X (line ~5845) + V4-J-3 default thresholds note | target: V1.6.1 | reason: TF-IDF weighted embeddings OR mean-vector subtraction for legal corpora; reduces boilerplate hubness in legal topic dedup; not load-bearing for V1.6 | OP-A: OBL-J-V161-LEGAL-HUBNESS-MITIGATION-01 | depends_on: V1.6 legal domain dedup threshold ≥0.93 enforcement (V4-AT-39) | complexity: medium
DOC25_TIER2_CACHE_BATCH_CONCATENATION | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (lines 8210/8450) per R-GEM #15 | target: V1.6.1 | reason: DOC25 implementation optimization (Tier 2 cache batch concatenation for sub-threshold docs), not DOC73 invariant; V1.6 satisfies V3-AT-7 staleness via stale-gate path without batch concat | OP-A: OBL-D25-V16-CACHE-BATCH-01 | depends_on: OBL-D25-V16-DOC-VERSION-MEMORY-01 | complexity: medium
CROSS_DOC_SCHEMA_CROSS_CHECK_TOOL | source: V4 §4.X-NO-LOCAL (line 7531) + INV-V16-NO-LOCAL-SCHEMA-1 verifier note | target: V1.6.1 | reason: Automated CI lint tool that cross-checks all V1.6 release-wave artifact type definitions against existing doc namespaces; V1.6 manual review until automated tool ships | OP-A: MISSING (covered by OBL-V16-CONFORMANCE-CHECK-CI-01 manual-review fallback in V1.6; automated tool is V1.6.1 add) | depends_on: OBL-V16-CONFORMANCE-CHECK-CI-01, OBL-EC-V16-OWNER-DOC-ADAPTER-01, OBL-D72-STORAGE-REGISTRY-CONSUMER-01 | complexity: medium
ARTIFACT_4_RETROACTIVE_4A_4B_SPLIT | source: V4 §4.X-DISPOSITION (line 8160) per R-CL4 #13 | target: V1.6.1 | reason: V1.6 keeps Artifact 4 monolithic (4,000-6,000 lines); if drafting reveals it's unworkable, V1.6.1 candidate is retroactive 4a/4b split. Architect's call. | OP-A: MISSING (process item; not a feature obligation) | depends_on: V1.6 Artifact 4 drafting completion | complexity: large
```
### 1.3 NOT SAFE for V1.6.1 (per V4 §0.5.1 NOT SAFE list — V4-EXPANDED) — surfaced here for record only; routed to V1.7 below
```text
HIERARCHICAL_TOPIC_ORGANIZATION_AS_V161 | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs + §0.5.1 | target: V1.7 (rejected from V1.6.1 lane per V4) | reason: changes graph hierarchy + governance — not "rapid patch" item | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-TOPIC-HIERARCHY-01 (V1.7) / OBL-V18-TOPIC-HIERARCHY-01 (V1.8+ reframe) | depends_on: V1.6 flat-topics ship (broader_topic_ref) | complexity: large
FULL_SUGGESTED_BINDINGS_AS_V161 | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs + §0.5.1 | target: V1.7 (rejected from V1.6.1 lane per V4) | reason: changes binding behavior + learning signals — not "rapid patch" item | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-SUGGESTED-BINDINGS-01 (V1.7) / OBL-V18-SUGGESTED-BINDINGS-01 (V1.8+ reframe) | depends_on: V1.6 read-only suggestions ship | complexity: large
GENERIC_FILTER_PREDICATE_UI_AS_V161 | source: V4 §0.5.1 | target: V1.7 (rejected from V1.6.1 lane) | reason: would resurrect deferred predicate DSL | OP-A: OBL-D72-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 + OBL-D73-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 | depends_on: predicate DSL spec landing in DOC72 R6 | complexity: large
ANCHOR_NODES_INTERACTION_POLISH | source: V4 §0.5.1 + V4-§0.5-1 per R-CG #26 | target: V1.7 (V4 REMOVED from V1.6.1 SAFE list) | reason: anchor node interaction touches graph governance (system topics that drift freely until user interaction; then permanent — see V4-J-4); even "polish" affects governance posture | OP-A: MISSING (no specific anchor-nodes V1.7 OBL row in V3.8) | depends_on: V1.6 anchor-nodes graph governance ship | complexity: medium
UI_CHANGES_ACCESS_ROUTING_RANKING_OR_GRAPH_WRITES | source: V4 §0.5.1 catch-all | target: V1.7 (rejected from V1.6.1 lane) | reason: any UI changing access / routing / ranking / graph writes requires full multi-reviewer red team | OP-A: case-by-case (each instance routes to its own V1.7 row) | depends_on: case-by-case | complexity: case-by-case
```
---
## §2. V1.7 Deferrals — Likely 6-Month Follow-Up (per V4 §0.3.5 V1.7 list)
```text
PREDICATE_DSL_DOC72 | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs + §0.3.5 + §3.6 K.7 / K.26 | target: V1.7 | reason: couples DOC73 V1.6 to DSL spec belonging to DOC72 R6; V1.6 ships structural selectors only per INV-K-SELECTOR-1 with explicit binding-creation rejection of predicate-set bindings | OP-A: OBL-D72-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 | depends_on: DOC72 R6 predicate DSL spec | complexity: large
PREDICATE_DSL_DOC73_COMPANION | source: V4 §3.6 K.26 (line 6948) | target: V1.7 | reason: DOC73-side companion of OBL-D72-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01; PredicateErrorPolicy schema retained as V1.7 candidate | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 | depends_on: OBL-D72-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 | complexity: medium
DECLASSIFY_SPLIT_VERB | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs + V4 V4-REJECTs (R-GEM #8) + §0.3.5 | target: V1.7 | reason: stretch verb; not load-bearing for V1.6 brief bank; optional escape from infectious taint propagation per V4-A-INV-TAINT (re-affirmed in V4) | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-DECLASSIFY-SPLIT-01 | depends_on: V1.6 OBL-A-TAINT-PROPAGATION-V16-01 in production for 1+ quarter | complexity: medium
DECLASSIFY_PATH | source: V4-O-DECLASS / R-G55S §24 + §0.3.5 V4 additions | target: V1.7 | reason: declassification path (sealed → firewalled → open downgrade) is workflow-heavy and requires user-confirmation surface; V1.6 ships visibility class enforcement only | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-DECLASSIFY-PATH-01 | depends_on: V1.6 visibility class enforcement stable | complexity: large
VERIFICATION_METHOD_AUDIT | source: V4 §6 + §0.3.5 | target: V1.7 | reason: V1.6 verifier calibration ships baseline (per V3.7 OBL-D7-NEW-V15-04 + OBL-D8-NEW-V15-01); V1.7 adds verification method audit job (verifier-of-verifiers pattern) | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-VERIFICATION-METHOD-AUDIT-01 | depends_on: V1.5.1 verifier calibration in production for 1+ quarter | complexity: medium
SELF_IMPROVEMENT_ENGINE_OBSERVABILITY | source: V4 §1-2 footnote + §0.3.5 + V4 §6 + R-EX §1 | target: V1.7 | reason: V1.5.1 §6D self-improvement engine ships baseline; V1.6 does not extend; V1.7 adds observation surface for inspecting self-improvement decisions (whether the engine is helping or regressing) | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-SELF-IMPROVE-OBS-01 | depends_on: V1.5.1 self-improvement engine in production for 1+ quarter | complexity: medium
HASH_REPUTATION_CHECK | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CL4 #2) + §0.3.5 V4 additions + V4-I-3.4.6 | target: V1.7 | reason: V1.6 strips phantom feature (no malware-hash-registry integration spec, no provider chosen, no API contract); V1.7+ candidate once privacy-preserving hash reputation API becomes available | OP-A: OBL-I-V17-HASH-REPUTATION-01 | depends_on: hash reputation API with privacy-preserving query becomes available | complexity: medium
SIZE_BAND_K_SELECTOR | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs + §0.3.5 + §3.6 K (line 6128) + V4-K-6 | target: V1.7 | reason: stealth predicate without numeric thresholds; V4 strips and defers (path b: defer rather than retrofit numeric thresholds); Group K binding-rule size_band classification | OP-A: OBL-K-V17-SIZE-BAND-01 | depends_on: V1.6 binding firings producing size-distribution telemetry for V1.7 design | complexity: small
V17_B1_CEREMONY | source: V4 inline patches + §3.2 Group B2 (V4-B2-2 strips access_ceremony_required entirely from V1.6; V1.7 ships ceremony) | target: V1.7 | reason: B1 conformance ceremony deferred to V1.7; V1.6 implementation rejects construction with `b1_not_yet_supported` reason code | OP-A: OBL-V17-B1-CEREMONY-01 | depends_on: V1.6 B2 write-time enforcement ship | complexity: medium
I18N_V1 | source: V4 §0.8 (line 1648) per V4-§0.8-I18N per R-CL4 #22 | target: V1.7 | reason: V1.6 ships English-only UI strings; i18n V1 layers on V1.5.1 §0D corpus → library terminology mapping baseline; V1.6 string registry should isolate user-facing strings into centralized constants file for forward-compatibility (note: forward-compat isolation is V1.6 implementation note, not invariant) | OP-A: OBL-V17-I18N-V1-01 | depends_on: V1.6 string registry isolation pattern | complexity: large
DOC75_NETWORKING_SCHEMA | source: V4 §6 + §3.4.1 + §0.3.5 + DOC75 parking-lot | target: V1.7 (DOC75 parallel track) | reason: Group I strips dormant networking hooks (user_identity_required, per_user_partitioning); DOC75 1-2 page boundary note authored before V1.7 design resolves networking schema posture | OP-A: OBL-D75-PARKING-LOT-01 | depends_on: DOC75 boundary note | complexity: large
```
---
## §3. V1.8+ Deferrals — True Future Generalizations (per V4 R-CL4 #37 reframe)
V4 §0.3.5 reframed several V3 V1.7 candidates as V1.8+ true future generalizations (no concrete timeline; cross-domain primitives, not V1.6-release-wave-specific).
```text
COMPLETABLE_UNIT_PRIMITIVE | source: V4 §0.3.5 V4 reframe per R-CL4 #37 (was V3 OBL-D73-V17-COMPLETABLE-UNIT-01 per V3-O-9 / R-V22 §8) | target: V1.8+ | reason: cross-domain primitive (CompletableUnit generalization across legal / medical / engineering / general); premature for V1.6; V1.6 ships specific FilingChain / MotionChain / CourtDispositionObservation legal-specific implementations only | OP-A: OBL-V18-COMPLETABLE-UNIT-01 | depends_on: architectural opportunity / sufficient cross-domain examples | complexity: large
HIERARCHICAL_TOPIC_ORGANIZATION | source: V4 §0.3.5 V4 reframe + V4 §0.5.1 NOT SAFE list | target: V1.8+ | reason: V1.6.1 NOT SAFE; reframe to V1.8+ true future generalization (changes graph hierarchy + governance) | OP-A: OBL-V18-TOPIC-HIERARCHY-01 | depends_on: architectural opportunity | complexity: large
AUTHORITY_VALIDITY_CHECK_POSTURE | source: V4 §0.3.5 V4 reframe + V4 §5 V3-REJECTs | target: V1.8+ | reason: cross-domain "is this authority still good law / still valid" generalization; V1.6 LegalEvidencePosture default is `argument_presence` or `argument_summary`; authority_validity_check is V1.7+ feature with explicit dependency declaration | OP-A: OBL-V18-AUTH-VALIDITY-01 | depends_on: architectural opportunity | complexity: large
FULL_SUGGESTED_BINDINGS_PATTERN | source: V4 §0.3.5 V4 reframe + V4 §0.5.1 NOT SAFE list | target: V1.8+ | reason: V1.6.1 NOT SAFE; reframe to V1.8+ true future generalization (changes binding behavior + learning signals); V1.6 ships read-only suggested bindings only per OBL-D73-V16-K-LIFECYCLE-01 | OP-A: OBL-V18-SUGGESTED-BINDINGS-01 | depends_on: architectural opportunity | complexity: large
SUBGRAPH_ISOLATION_PRIMITIVE | source: V4 §0.3.5 V4 reframe per R-CL4 #37 (subsumes stale V3-era §6 line 8299 mention which framed as V1.7; V4 reframe canonical) | target: V1.8+ | reason: subgraph isolation as primitive across domains (true future generalization); V1.6 ships visibility class enforcement only. **Note:** V4 §6 V1.7 list (line 8299) reads "Subgraph isolation full feature (Group E)" but this is stale V3-era text — V4 §0.3.5 R-CL4 #37 reframe explicitly puts subgraph isolation in V1.8+ ("true future generalization"), and V3.8 §8.2 ships only `OBL-V18-SUBGRAPH-ISOLATION-01` (no V17 row). | OP-A: OBL-V18-SUBGRAPH-ISOLATION-01 | depends_on: architectural opportunity | complexity: large
```
---
## §4. Indefinite / "Future" Items — No Committed Target
```text
HARD_EDITORIAL_SPLIT_INTO_3_DOC73_DOCS | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs + V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-GEM #3) + §0.4.3 | target: future (post-V1.6) | reason: V3/V4 use 5-artifact soft split per §0.4; hard editorial split decision deferred to post-V1.6; soft split + cross-artifact reference syntax in Landing Matrix mitigates context window concerns | OP-A: MISSING (process decision; not a feature) | depends_on: V1.6 5-artifact soft split shipped + drafting friction observation | complexity: medium
CSA_CONTINUITY_LOG_CARVE_OUT_OPTION | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs (CSA continuity log "two viable resolutions") | target: future (V1.7+ if ephemeral-staging case emerges) | reason: V3-N-3 picked "wrap" decisively; carve-out option deferred to V1.7+ if ephemeral-staging case actually surfaces in production | OP-A: MISSING (V1.6 ships "wrap" path; carve-out is contingent V1.7+ not yet scoped) | depends_on: ephemeral-staging case observed in production | complexity: medium
ADR_PRIMITIVE_IN_OPA | source: V4 §5 V3-REJECTs (CL-1 R2 Proposal #5) | target: OP-A V4 (process; not a release-wave artifact) | reason: process improvement, not V1.6 spec scope; ADR (Architecture Decision Record) primitive integration into OP-A workflow | OP-A: OBL-OPA-V4-ADR-PRIMITIVE-01 | depends_on: OP-A V4 session | complexity: medium
SEALED_MODE_BYPASS_API_CACHING | source: V4 §4.3 (V2 carried + V3 refinement) | target: future (V1.7+ pending caching contract) | reason: cross-cutting issue around API caching; V1.6 ships per current refinement; future revision may require new caching contract | OP-A: MISSING (cross-cutting; covered indirectly by V3.7 OBL-D25-NEW-V15-* DOC25 contracts) | depends_on: API caching contract revision | complexity: medium
```
---
## §5. REJECTs with No Deferral Target — Archived for Record
These items were rejected outright in V4 adjudication. They are NOT ship-targets for any future version; archived here so future reviewers can verify the decision and rationale rather than re-litigating.
### 5.1 V3 REJECTs (carried from V2 + V3-specific rejections)
```text
GROUP_A_INVENTORY_SPLIT_INTO_SUBSTRATE_PLUS_ALGEBRA | source: V4 §5 (CL-1 R1 + CL-2 R1.5) | target: REJECTED | reason: useful conceptual framing for risk assessment, but inventory split creates coordination overhead; co-design as Group A | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
PRE_V16_HARD_EDITORIAL_SPLIT_INTO_3_DOC73_DOCS | source: V4 §5 (GEM §B6) | target: REJECTED | reason: V3 uses 5-artifact soft split per §0.4; hard editorial split decision deferred to post-V1.6 (see §4 above for future revisit) | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
DOC73_V16_OWNS_GROUP_L_UI_DISCIPLINE | source: V4 §5 (inventory baseline) | target: REJECTED | reason: Group L is cross-doc design note (per V2 ACCEPT_MOD; V3 carries) | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
KERNEL_WITHOUT_ALGEBRA_OK_FRAMING | source: V4 §5 (inventory baseline) | target: REJECTED | reason: kernel + algebra land together (all V1-pass reviewers converge) | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
MEMORY_VS_CONTENT_AS_PRIMARILY_UI_CONCERN | source: V4 §5 (inventory baseline) | target: REJECTED | reason: fundamentally misframes; becomes Group M architectural runtime contract per §2.1 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SOURCE_BINDINGS_PROPOSAL_AS_IS | source: V4 §5 (proposal V1) | target: REJECTED | reason: 30+ V1-pass issues + 11 V3 patches require V1.1 redraft before absorption per §3.6 | OP-A: N/A (V1.1 redraft is V1.6 drafting gate, not deferral) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SECTION_3_6_PLACEMENT_FOR_SOURCE_BINDINGS | source: V4 §5 (proposal + CGPT-1) | target: REJECTED | reason: collision with V1.5.1 §3.6 INV-3.6 9-tab lock; use §3.7 per §3.6 placement note | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
DOCUMENT_INGESTION_PERMISSION_AS_BARE_FLAG | source: V4 §5 (inventory baseline) | target: REJECTED | reason: replaced with `ingestion_permission` object per Group I §3.4 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
DORMANT_NETWORKING_HOOKS | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-EX Final + V3-I-1) | target: REJECTED (changed from V2 CONFLICT_PENDING) | reason: dormant fields invite implementation invention; stripped per §3.4.1; DOC75 parking-lot note (`OBL-D75-PARKING-LOT-01`) preserves migration path | OP-A: OBL-D75-PARKING-LOT-01 (migration path only; feature itself rejected) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
PREDICATE_AS_METADATA_FILTER_STEALTH_DSL | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-EX §11 + R-V22 §10) | target: REJECTED | reason: V2 wording "filters operating on registered metadata fields" was functionally a predicate DSL; V3 explicit per V3-K-1 — structural selectors only with enumerated kinds | OP-A: N/A (DSL deferred to V1.7 separately; this REJECT is the stealth-DSL framing) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
NUEXTRACT_AS_ARCHITECTURAL_PRIMITIVE_ALL_DOMAINS | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-EX §2.2 + R-V22 §10) | target: REJECTED | reason: NuExtract is implementation, not primitive; V3 introduces `StructuredExtractionStrategy` enum as primitive per V3-O-4 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
DOCUMENT_REQUIRED_AS_POSTURE | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-EX §2.1) | target: REJECTED | reason: document_required is a failure state, not a posture; moved to `SearchPlanFailure` per V3-M-2 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
EVENT_OBSERVATION_ONLY_AS_BINDING_TARGET_KIND | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-V22 §11) | target: REJECTED | reason: nearly indistinguishable from logging; V3 has 5 BindingTargetKinds without it per V3-K-3 (corpus_document_membership / case_metadata_update / relationship_candidate / court_disposition_observation / extraction_task); if a binding sees something it doesn't act on, that's a non-match | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
HIERARCHICAL_TOPICS_IN_V161_RAPID_PATCH_LANE | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-EX §25 + R-V22 §27) | target: REJECTED (deferred to V1.7 / V1.8+ instead — see §2.HIERARCHICAL_TOPIC_ORGANIZATION_AS_V161 above) | reason: changes graph hierarchy + governance; not "rapid patch" item; V1.6.1 lane TIGHTENED per §0.5.1 | OP-A: see V1.7 / V1.8+ tracking | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
FULL_SUGGESTED_BINDINGS_IN_V161_RAPID_PATCH_LANE | source: V4 §5 V3-patch (R-EX §25 + R-V22 §27) | target: REJECTED (deferred to V1.7 / V1.8+ instead) | reason: changes binding behavior + learning signals; not "rapid patch" item; V1.6.1 lane TIGHTENED | OP-A: see V1.7 / V1.8+ tracking | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
V21_PLUS_V22_STAGED_REVIEW_OF_CARD | source: V4 §5 (R-V21 + R-V22) | target: REJECTED | reason: two-pass review for ~75 distinct items adds round-trip cost without proportional value; V3 produced as single-pass response to V2 review | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SECTION_6_4_MECHANISM_4_FRESHNESS_PRE_PICKED_TO_DOC25_15 | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.3 | target: REJECTED (decision moved to Landing Matrix per V3-N-5) | reason: candidates were DOC25 §15 + IngestionQualityReport / DOC72 staleness / hybrid; pre-pick rejected — Landing Matrix is the deciding instrument | OP-A: N/A (Landing Matrix is V1.6 release contract, not a deferral) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
CSA_CONTINUITY_LOG_TWO_VIABLE_RESOLUTIONS_DEFERRED_DECISION | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.3 | target: REJECTED (decision made — V3-N-3 picks "wrap"; carve-out option separately deferred to V1.7+ — see §4 above) | reason: V3-N-3 picks wrap decisively | OP-A: see §4 CSA_CONTINUITY_LOG_CARVE_OUT_OPTION | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
RECENT_ACTIVITY_MD_AS_CANONICAL_STORE | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.3 | target: REJECTED | reason: markdown is render view; canonical truth is structured `recent_activity_rollups.jsonl` per V3-N-2 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SINGLE_RETRIEVALPOSTURE_PLUS_PARALLEL_TYPES | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.1 | target: REJECTED | reason: three parallel types (RetrievalPosture + SearchSurfaceScope + QuerySurfaceIntent) let coding agents pick contradictory defaults; V3 consolidates per V3-M-1 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
MEMORY_PRIMARY_DEFAULT_FOR_THEMES_ACROSS_BRIEFS | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.1 | target: REJECTED | reason: reopens phantom certainty for cross-brief synthesis; V3-M-3 default: synthesis_disclosed + source_span_required: true + source_span_count_minimum: 3 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SQL_TRIGGER_FOR_STALE_MEMORY_GATE | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.1 | target: REJECTED | reason: DOC73 specifying SQL triggers crosses ownership boundary; V3-M-4: event-driven via DOC25 DocumentArtifactVersionChanged | OP-A: N/A (replaced by emitter/consumer pair in V3.8) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
RULING_DISPOSITION_AS_SINGLE_OBJECT_ON_COURT_ORDER | source: V4 §5 V2-§2.2 | target: REJECTED | reason: real orders dispose multiple motions / defendants / claims; V3-O-5: array per CourtOrderDisposition | OP-A: N/A (replaced by OBL-O-RULING-DISPOSITION-01 with scope_targets[]) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
```
### 5.2 V4-NEW REJECTs (added in V4 review cycle)
```text
HARD_SPLIT_DOC73_PART1_PART2_BEFORE_V16_DRAFTING | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-GEM #3) | target: REJECTED | reason: architect's existing soft-split-during-drafting position retained; hard editorial split decision deferred to post-V1.6 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
DECLASSIFY_SPLIT_VERB_V16_RE_AFFIRMED | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-GEM #8) | target: REJECTED for V1.6 (V3 disposition holds — DEFERRED to V1.7) | reason: V3 already deferred to V1.7+; re-affirmed in V4 | OP-A: OBL-D73-V17-DECLASSIFY-SPLIT-01 (V1.7 tracking; not a V1.6 obligation) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
FILINGUNIT_AS_WORK_PRODUCT_DOC72_ENTITY_SUBTYPE | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CG #8 partial) | target: REJECTED | reason: V4 splits cleaner: FilingUnit = world_entity (external court filing fact); MotionChain / FilingChain / CorpusProfile = work_product (host's analytical labeling); per V4-O-1 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
RANKED_TOP_K_NOT_EXHAUSTIVE_COLLAPSED | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-G55 #9 alternative framing) | target: REJECTED | reason: top-k truncation is intentional (performance optimization), not failure (resource exhaustion); distinct semantic value justifies new enum value; V4 keeps separate per V4-M-6 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
ACCESS_CEREMONY_REQUIRED_TAGGED_BUT_PRESENT | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (V3's tagged approach) | target: REJECTED (V4 strips entirely) | reason: V3 left value in enum tagged defer_to_b1; V4 strips entirely; V1.6 implementation rejects construction with `b1_not_yet_supported` reason code; cleaner per V4-B2-2 | OP-A: OBL-V17-B1-CEREMONY-01 (V1.7 ceremony tracking; B2 V1.6 ships without ceremony) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
USER_INITIATED_RE_EXECUTION_AS_AUDIT_REPLAY_STRATEGY | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (V3's enum) | target: REJECTED (V4 removes) | reason: user-initiated re-execution is NEW operation, not replay; cluttering replay enum with non-replay semantics confuses coding agents; V4 removes per V4-A-2 | OP-A: N/A | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SIZE_BAND_SELECTOR_WITH_IMPLICIT_THRESHOLDS | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (V3's selector) | target: REJECTED for V1.6 (DEFERRED to V1.7 — see §2.SIZE_BAND_K_SELECTOR above) | reason: stealth predicate without numeric thresholds; V4 strips and defers per V4-K-6 | OP-A: OBL-K-V17-SIZE-BAND-01 (V1.7 tracking) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
HASH_REPUTATION_CHECK_V16_FILE_SAFETY | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CL4 #2) | target: REJECTED for V1.6 (DEFERRED to V1.7 — see §2.HASH_REPUTATION_CHECK above) | reason: no malware-hash-registry integration spec, no provider chosen, no API contract; V4 strips per V4-I-3.4.6 | OP-A: OBL-I-V17-HASH-REPUTATION-01 (V1.7 tracking) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SECTION_6_4_MECHANISM_4_IN_ARTIFACT_2 | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CL4 #4) | target: REJECTED (V4 reclassifies to Artifact 1) | reason: Mechanism 4 is the rollup primitive for any session activity; legal-specific consumer surfaces remain in Artifact 2 but canonical schema lives in Core (Artifact 1) per V4-§0.4-2 | OP-A: N/A (reclassification, not deferral) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
EC_OWNS_CAPABILITY_REGISTRY | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CG #1 + R-G55X §3) | target: REJECTED (V4 corrects to DOC24) | reason: V3 §0.4 Artifact 4 incorrectly listed EC as capability registry owner; V3 §4.1 says DOC24 owns it; V4 corrects per V4-§0.4-1; EC owns capacity leases + capability execution gating; DOC24 owns the registry | OP-A: N/A (ownership clarification, not deferral) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
SECTION_0_7_REDEFINING_DOC72_STORAGE_REGISTRY_ENTRY | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CG #2 + R-G55 #2 + R-G55X §4) | target: REJECTED (V4 consumes DOC72) | reason: V3 shipped its own StorageRegistryEntry schema; DOC72 already owns this; V4 consumes DOC72's per V4-§0.7-1; V1.6 obligation is registration into DOC72's registry, not authorship of new schema | OP-A: OBL-D72-STORAGE-REGISTRY-CONSUMER-01 + OBL-EC-STORAGE-REG-V16-01 (consumption tracking; not deferral) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
INV_V16_RETENTION_1_LUMPING_EPHEMERAL_WITH_STATE_CHANGING | source: V4 §5 V4-REJECTs (R-CG #3 + R-G55 #3 + R-G55X §5) | target: REJECTED (V4 splits) | reason: V3 lumped state-changing receipts (BindingEvaluationManifest, ExtractionAttempt records) with read-only search receipts; state-changing receipts cannot be downgraded to session-only; V4 splits per V4-§0.7-2 into INV-V16-RETENTION-EPHEMERAL-1 + INV-V16-RETENTION-DURABLE-1 | OP-A: OBL-K-MANIFEST-DURABLE-01 + OBL-D24-RETENTION-V16-01 (split tracking; not deferral) | depends_on: N/A | complexity: N/A
```
---
## §6. OP-A Row Gaps — Deferrals Without OP-A Tracking
These items are deferred from V1.6 but have no explicit OP-A row in `OPA_V3_8.md`. They need OP-A backfill before V1.6 ships, OR architect confirmation that the gap is acceptable (covered by another row, or below OP-A row granularity).
| # | ITEM_NAME | Section | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADDITIONAL_LEGAL_PROFILE_STARTERS | §1.1 | Architect: confirm OK below OP-A granularity (V1.6.1 polish), OR add `OBL-D73-V161-LEGAL-PROFILES-EXPANSION-01` |
| 2 | SEARCH_UI_REFINEMENTS_NO_ROUTER_CHANGES | §1.1 | Architect: covered by Q Dashboard backlog, no OP-A needed |
| 3 | READ_ONLY_SUGGESTED_BINDINGS_DISPLAY (V1.6.1 polish) | §1.1 | Architect: V1.6 logic side covered (OBL-D73-V16-K-LIFECYCLE-01); V1.6.1 polish below OP-A granularity |
| 4 | FILTER_UI_OVER_V16_STRUCTURAL_FILTERS (V1.6.1 polish) | §1.1 | Architect: covered by V1.6 J.5 9-filter base; V1.6.1 polish below OP-A granularity |
| 5 | CROSS_DOC_SCHEMA_CROSS_CHECK_TOOL (V1.6.1 verifier) | §1.2 | Architect: add `OBL-V161-SCHEMA-CHECK-TOOL-01` OR confirm covered by OBL-V16-CONFORMANCE-CHECK-CI-01 manual-review fallback |
| 6 | ARTIFACT_4_RETROACTIVE_4A_4B_SPLIT | §1.2 | Architect: process item; no OP-A row needed |
| 7 | ANCHOR_NODES_INTERACTION_POLISH (V4 moved from V1.6.1 to V1.7) | §1.3 | Architect: add `OBL-D73-V17-ANCHOR-NODES-POLISH-01` to OP-A V3.8.1 §8.1 V1.7 deferred section |
| 8 | UI_CHANGES_ACCESS_ROUTING_RANKING_OR_GRAPH_WRITES (catch-all) | §1.3 | Architect: case-by-case per instance; no single OP-A row needed |
| 9 | SUBGRAPH_ISOLATION (V1.7 form per V4 §6 list) | ~~§2~~ §3 | **RESOLVED in R1 audit pass.** V4 §0.3.5 R-CL4 #37 reframe is later and explicitly canonical — puts subgraph isolation in V1.8+ ("true future generalizations"). V4 §6 line 8299 V1.7 mention is stale V3-era text superseded by reframe. V3.8 §8.2 `OBL-V18-SUBGRAPH-ISOLATION-01` is the canonical tracking row. **No backfill required.** Inventory §2 entry consolidated into §3 entry. |
| 10 | HARD_EDITORIAL_SPLIT_INTO_3_DOC73_DOCS | §4 | Architect: process decision; no OP-A row needed |
| 11 | CSA_CONTINUITY_LOG_CARVE_OUT_OPTION | §4 | Architect: contingent V1.7+; no OP-A row until ephemeral-staging case observed |
| 12 | SEALED_MODE_BYPASS_API_CACHING | §4 | Architect: cross-cutting; covered indirectly by V3.7 OBL-D25-NEW-V15-* DOC25 contracts |
**Total OP-A row gaps requiring backfill: 0.** Item #9 RESOLVED in R1 audit (V4 §0.3.5 reframe canonical; no V17 row needed). Items #1-#8 and #10-#12 are below OP-A row granularity or process-only — architect confirmation requested but not blocking V1.6 ship.
---
## §7. Summary Statistics
| Category | Count | Notes |
|---|---:|---|
| **V1.6.1 candidates (SAFE per V4 §0.5.1)** | 4 | Additional legal profile starters; search UI refinements; read-only Suggested Bindings display; filter UI over V1.6 structural filters. **Each requires Safe Patch Audit per V4-AT-39.** |
| **V1.6.1 candidates (V4-NEW from inline patches)** | 4 | Legal hubness mitigation (TF-IDF / mean-vector subtraction); DOC25 Tier 2 cache batch concatenation; cross-doc schema cross-check tool (verifier); Artifact 4 retroactive 4a/4b split (contingent). |
| **V1.6.1 candidates rejected from lane (per V4 §0.5.1 NOT SAFE expanded)** | 5 | Hierarchical topic organization (→V1.7/V1.8+); full Suggested Bindings (→V1.7/V1.8+); generic filter/predicate UI (→V1.7); Anchor Nodes interaction polish (→V1.7, V4 REMOVED from SAFE list); UI changes access/routing/ranking/graph writes (catch-all → case-by-case). |
| **Total V1.6.1 candidates (combined SAFE list)** | **8** | Sum of SAFE rapid-patch candidates (items rejected from lane redirected to V1.7). |
| **V1.7 deferrals** | **11** | Predicate DSL DOC72; Predicate DSL DOC73 companion; declassify_split verb; declassify path; verification_method audit; self-improvement engine observability; hash_reputation_check; size_band K selector; B1 ceremony; i18n V1; DOC75 networking schema. (Subgraph isolation removed from V1.7 in R1 audit — V4 §0.3.5 reframe per R-CL4 #37 puts it in V1.8+; consolidated into §3.) |
| **V1.8+ deferrals (per V4 R-CL4 #37 reframe)** | 5 | CompletableUnit primitive; hierarchical topic organization; authority validity check posture; full Suggested Bindings pattern; subgraph isolation primitive. |
| **Indefinite / future** | 4 | Hard editorial split into 3 DOC73 docs; CSA continuity log carve-out option; ADR primitive in OP-A (process); sealed-mode bypass API caching. |
| **REJECTs (V3-carried, archived for record)** | **23** | Inventory split A-Substrate+A-Algebra; pre-V1.6 hard editorial split; DOC73 V1.6 owns Group L UI discipline; kernel without algebra OK framing; memory-vs-content as primarily UI concern; source bindings proposal as-is; §3.6 placement for source bindings; document_ingestion_permission as bare flag; dormant networking hooks; predicate-as-metadata-filter stealth DSL; NuExtract as architectural primitive; document_required as posture; event_observation_only as BindingTargetKind; hierarchical topics in V1.6.1 lane; full Suggested Bindings in V1.6.1 lane; V2.1+V2.2 staged review of card; §6.4 Mechanism 4 freshness pre-picked to DOC25 §15; CSA continuity log two viable resolutions deferred decision; recent_activity.md as canonical store; single RetrievalPosture + parallel types; memory_primary default for themes across briefs; SQL trigger for stale-memory gate; RulingDisposition as single object on Court Order. **(V4 §5 V3-REJECTs table has 30 rows total; 7 have V1.7+ deferral targets and appear in §2 above; 23 are pure REJECTs.)** |
| **REJECTs (V4-NEW, archived for record)** | 12 | Hard-split DOC73 Part1/Part2 before V1.6 drafting; declassify_split V1.6 re-affirmed; FilingUnit as work_product DOC72 entity_subtype; ranked_top_k_not_exhaustive collapsed; access_ceremony_required tagged-but-present; user_initiated_re_execution as AuditReplayStrategy; size_band selector implicit thresholds; hash_reputation_check V1.6 file-safety; §6.4 Mechanism 4 in Artifact 2; EC owns capability registry; §0.7 redefining DOC72 StorageRegistryEntry; INV-V16-RETENTION-1 lumping. **(V4 §5 V4-NEW REJECTs table has 13 rows; 1 (Tier 2 cache batch) has V1.6.1 deferral target and appears in §1.2 above; 12 are pure REJECTs.)** |
| **Total REJECTs (archived; both V3 and V4)** | **35** | 23 V3-carried + 12 V4-NEW. Some have V1.7/V1.6.1 deferral pointers; most are pure rejections. |
| **OP-A row gaps requiring backfill** | **1** | Item #9 in §6 (subgraph isolation V1.7 form vs V1.8+ reframe — architect confirmation needed). All other gaps are below OP-A row granularity or process-only. |
### Item totals
| Statistic | Value |
|---|---:|
| Total V1.6.1 candidates (combined SAFE list — §1.1 + §1.2) | 8 |
| Total V1.7 deferrals (§2) | 11 |
| Total V1.8+ deferrals (§3) | 5 |
| Total indefinite (§4) | 4 |
| Total REJECTs archived (§5.1 + §5.2) | 35 |
| Total OP-A row gaps (deferrals without OP-A tracking) | 0 |
| **Total inventory items (V1.6 not-shipping universe)** | **63** |
---
## §8. Cross-References
### 8.1 V1.6 deferrals that have OP-A V3.8 tracking (verified present in `OPA_V3_8.md` §6 or §8)
V3.8 deferred §8 rows (17 total) match the following V1.7 / V1.8+ deferrals from this inventory:
| Inventory item | OP-A V3.8 row | OP-A V3.8 location |
|---|---|---|
| §1.2 LEGAL_HUBNESS_MITIGATION | OBL-J-V161-LEGAL-HUBNESS-MITIGATION-01 | §6.26.J Group J (V1.6.1) |
| §1.2 DOC25_TIER2_CACHE_BATCH_CONCATENATION | OBL-D25-V16-CACHE-BATCH-01 (canonical) + OBL-D25-D24-V16-CACHE-BATCH-01 (redirect stub) | §6.19 DOC25 V3.8 ADDITIONS (V1.6.1) |
| §2 PREDICATE_DSL_DOC72 | OBL-D72-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 PREDICATE_DSL_DOC73_COMPANION | OBL-D73-V17-PREDICATE-DSL-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 DECLASSIFY_SPLIT_VERB | OBL-D73-V17-DECLASSIFY-SPLIT-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 DECLASSIFY_PATH | OBL-D73-V17-DECLASSIFY-PATH-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 VERIFICATION_METHOD_AUDIT | OBL-D73-V17-VERIFICATION-METHOD-AUDIT-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 SELF_IMPROVEMENT_ENGINE_OBSERVABILITY | OBL-D73-V17-SELF-IMPROVE-OBS-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 HASH_REPUTATION_CHECK | OBL-I-V17-HASH-REPUTATION-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 SIZE_BAND_K_SELECTOR | OBL-K-V17-SIZE-BAND-01 | §8.1 V1.7 Deferred |
| §2 V17_B1_CEREMONY | OBL-V17-B1-CEREMONY-01 | §8.5 Other V1.7 |
| §2 I18N_V1 | OBL-V17-I18N-V1-01 | §8.5 Other V1.7 |
| ~~§2 SUBGRAPH_ISOLATION_FULL_FEATURE_GROUP_E~~ → §3 (R1 audit consolidation) | OBL-V18-SUBGRAPH-ISOLATION-01 | §8.2 V1.8+ Deferred (V4 reframe canonical per R-CL4 #37) |
| §2 DOC75_NETWORKING_SCHEMA | OBL-D75-PARKING-LOT-01 | §8.4 Parking-Lot |
| §3 COMPLETABLE_UNIT_PRIMITIVE | OBL-V18-COMPLETABLE-UNIT-01 | §8.2 V1.8+ Deferred |
| §3 HIERARCHICAL_TOPIC_ORGANIZATION | OBL-V18-TOPIC-HIERARCHY-01 | §8.2 V1.8+ Deferred |
| §3 AUTHORITY_VALIDITY_CHECK_POSTURE | OBL-V18-AUTH-VALIDITY-01 | §8.2 V1.8+ Deferred |
| §3 FULL_SUGGESTED_BINDINGS_PATTERN | OBL-V18-SUGGESTED-BINDINGS-01 | §8.2 V1.8+ Deferred |
| §3 SUBGRAPH_ISOLATION_PRIMITIVE | OBL-V18-SUBGRAPH-ISOLATION-01 | §8.2 V1.8+ Deferred |
| §4 ADR_PRIMITIVE_IN_OPA | OBL-OPA-V4-ADR-PRIMITIVE-01 | §8.3 Process-Only |
### 8.2 V1.6 V1.7 deferrals retained (per V4 R-CL4 #37 reframe note)
V4 reframed 5 V3 V1.7 candidates to V1.8+ true future generalizations. The V3 V1.7 IDs (`OBL-D73-V17-COMPLETABLE-UNIT-01`, `OBL-D73-V17-AUTH-VALIDITY-01`, `OBL-D73-V17-TOPIC-HIERARCHY-01`, `OBL-D73-V17-SUGGESTED-BINDINGS-01`, `OBL-D73-V17-SUBGRAPH-ISOLATION-01`) were superseded by V18 IDs in V3.8 §8.2. **V3.8 does NOT carry the V17 versions of these as separate rows** (per V4 reframe). If architect prefers to retain both V17 and V18 IDs for traceability, OP-A V3.8.1 should add the V17 stub rows pointing at V18 successors.
### 8.3 V1.7 / V1.6.1 candidates without OP-A V3.8 tracking — gap list
Per §6 above, 1 confirmed gap (subgraph isolation V1.7 form). 11 other items are below OP-A row granularity or covered by adjacent rows / process-only — architect confirmation requested for each.
---
## §9. Verification
This R1 inventory was produced by:
1. Reading V4 §5 (Specific REJECTs) — full both V3-carried table and V4-NEW table extracted.
2. Reading V4 §6 (Recommended V1.6 scope) — V1.6.1 candidates list + V1.7 deferrals list extracted.
3. Reading V4 §0.3.5 (V1.7 candidate row backlog + V4 reframe) — V17 / V18 IDs cross-referenced.
4. Reading V4 §0.3.6 (Bonus OP-A rows) — V4 NEW V1.6 rows confirmed (no deferrals; not relevant to this inventory).
5. Reading V4 §0.5 (V1.6.1 rapid-patch lane TIGHTENED + V4 Safe Patch Audit gate).
6. Reading V4 §0.8 (i18n flag).
7. Grepping V4 inline for "DEFER", "defer", "V1.7", "V1.8", "V1.6.1 candidate" — 100+ matches reviewed.
8. Cross-referencing every deferred item with `OPA_V3_8.md` §8 (Deferred Obligations) to verify OP-A row tracking.
9. Flagging gaps (§6 above).
**Totals reconcile** with V3.8 §8 deferred row count of 17 (10 V1.7 + 5 V1.8+ + 1 process + 1 parking) — this inventory adds the 8 V1.6.1 candidates (which V3.8 §6 carries inline as `v1_target: V1.6.1`) + items below OP-A granularity.
---
## §10. Stage 5R3 Pass 2 deferrals (2026-05-28)
Per Stage 5R3 Pass 1 architect decisions D3b + D6 (see `Memory Rebuild Docs/Flattening/Execution Ledger/Stage_5R3/PASS_1_ARCHITECT_DECISIONS_RESOLVED.md`).
### §10.1 DOC23 Addenda B obligation deferral (D3b)
**33 explicit OBL-* IDs from DOC23 Addenda B current sources are deferred from OP-A V4 entirely. Out of scope until the DOC80 flatten completes.**
Source files containing the deferred IDs:
- `Current Specs/DOC23/DOC23 Addenda B/DOC23_ADDB_OUTCOME_EVALUATOR_REVISOR_V3_3_1.md` — 29 IDs
- `Current Specs/DOC23/DOC23 Addenda B/DOC23_ADDB_SUBSYS_SOURCE_WORKSPACE_V1_0_1.md` — 3 IDs
- `Current Specs/DOC23/DOC23 Addenda B/DOC23_ADDB_SUBSYS_TASK_FORUM_RUN_BOARD_V1_0_1.md` — 1 ID
Total: 33 IDs.
Per architect decision: these are NOT minted as Pass 2 Bucket A / B / C rows. They re-enter OP-A consideration after Stage 6 charter authoring completes and DOC80 family schemas are operative. The enumerated IDs are preserved in `Memory Rebuild Docs/Flattening/Execution Ledger/Stage_5R3/PASS_1_SELF_AUDIT.md` "Missing Explicit ID Summary" section for re-entry.
### §10.2 RecentActivityRollup consumer/orchestration deferral (D6)
Per Pass 1 D6 architect decision: the Running Brief consumer/orchestration story is DEPRECATED-with-capture; the CSA extraction report §6.1/§6.2/§6.3 verbatim disposition applies. Specific consumer/orchestration deferrals are tracked here as a single line item; mechanism details live in the CSA extraction audit (`Memory Rebuild Docs/Flattening/Execution Ledger/DOC73_V1_6_CSA_EXTRACTION_AUDIT.md`). Re-entry occurs at DOC85 E9 charter authoring.
---
**End of DOC73 V1.6 Deferral Inventory R1.1 (Stage 5R3 Pass 2 ratification update 2026-05-28).**