Elnor Repo Reader

ELNOR REPO READER TEXT MIRROR
Original path: Memory Rebuild Docs/Flattening/Execution Ledger/Stage_3_Codex_Adjudication.md
Source repo: /Users/OpenClaw1/Elnor/Elnor Specs
Git branch: main
Git commit: dbaa25962edc11ab30e8d4ca1715f9ae5bf77331
Generated: 2026-06-09T01:23:58.539Z

---

# Stage 3 — Codex Review Adjudication

**Date:** 2026-05-25
**Review source:** Codex Stage 3 review (Capability Inventory)
**Review response file:** `Memory Rebuild Docs/Flattening/Reviews/Codex Responses/Stage_3_Review_Response.md` (verbatim Codex reply, archived by Will)
**Artifacts patched:** `Capability_Inventory.md` (110 → 113 rows after patches)

## Adjudication table

| finding_id | review_source | finding_type | disposition | reason | affected_sections / capability_id | patch_ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1-1 | Codex | BUG | accepted | `08_Coverage_Audit_and_Patch_Log.md` was tagged `process` by registry keyword-match and got no capability row, even though it is target-package architecture content (TopicLens, IssueFrameUpdate, PromptShellVariant, DOC24/KDA/BDSM boundaries). | new row `cap-08-coverage-audit-and-patch-log` | capability gate relaxed to include `active_target_baseline` files regardless of `first_glance_relevance` |
| A1-2 | Codex | CONFIRMED | accepted | Other process/low files defensibly omitted (connectors, costs, account build, manifests, trackers, punch lists). | n/a | no change |
| A2 | Codex | CONFIRMED | accepted | All 15 plan §6.4 seeded crown-jewel families present. | seed-* rows | no change |
| A3 | Codex | CONFIRMED | accepted | All addenda families present (DOC23 Addenda B subsystems, DOC24 Addendum A BDSM, DOC24 KDA, DOC3 Addenda A, EC Core Addendum A, DOC20 Addendum B, DOC2 Freshness Manager). | n/a | no change |
| B1 | Codex | CONFIRMED | accepted | H1-derived capability names are reasonable. | n/a | no change |
| B2-1 | Codex | BUG | accepted | DOC24 KDA file is the concrete source for the KDA crown-jewel family. | `cap-doc24-kda-r3-draft-v0-3-1` | tier `load_bearing` → `crown_jewel_must_showcase` via filename-based heuristic (KDA in basename) |
| B2-2 | Codex | BUG | accepted | DOC24 Addendum A is the concrete source for BDSM. | `cap-doc24-addendum-a-bdsm-v6-5-draft-v0-3-1` | tier `load_bearing` → `crown_jewel_must_showcase` via BDSM filename match |
| B2-3 | Codex | BUG | accepted | DOC25 V2.0 Doc Intelligence is the concrete source for DOC25 parse/materialization. | `cap-doc25-v2-0-doc-intelligence` (any DOC25 file now crown_jewel) | DOC25 in path → crown_jewel |
| B2-4 | Codex | SUGGESTION | accepted | DOC73 Corpus Source Bindings is concrete source for Library/corpus deep-ingestion. | `cap-doc73-corpus-source-bindings-proposal-v1` | DOC73 in path → crown_jewel (auto-promoted) |
| B3 | Codex | BUG | accepted | DOC26 owner was `external (unknown)` because `guess_owner()` only checked filename, not folder. Folder `DOC26 UnifiedWorkspaceLibrary/` carries the canonical owner. | `cap-unified-workspace-library-project-proposal-r0-4` | `guess_owner()` now checks folder parts before filename |
| B4 | Codex | CONFIRMED | accepted | Disposition pattern defensible; `08_Coverage_Audit` row added with `absorbed` disposition (target package). | n/a | covered by A1 patch |
| C1-1 | Codex | BUG | accepted with architect nuance | Will (architect): proposal-named files should NOT be auto-demoted just because of the word "proposal." Some are well-developed (DOC23 Addenda B / DOC24 BDSM / DOC24 KDA / DOC2 Freshness Manager) and stay `operative_capability`. The 5 Codex flagged are genuinely preliminary and become `aspirational_valuable` with `preservation_required = yes` so they are not lost. | DOC25 file-materialization proposal V1.1, DOC73 corpus-source-bindings proposal V1, DOC73 §6.4 mechanism-4 rollup proposal V1, Memory Intake and At-Use Disciplines proposal V1, EC Core Addendum A intake-routing proposal V1 | explicit override list `ASPIRATIONAL_PROPOSAL_FILES` |
| C1-2 | Codex | CONFIRMED | accepted | DOC23 Addenda B / DOC24 BDSM / DOC24 KDA / DOC2 Freshness Manager keep `operative_capability` (well-developed, not speculative). | n/a | no change |
| D1 | Codex | CONFIRMED + recommendation | accepted | TopicLens / TopicCollectionDirective seed kept; cross-references added to point at the concrete sources (02_Concept_Model, 12_ABC, 13_Round_D, 08_Coverage_Audit). | `seed-topiclens-and-topiccollectiondirective` | `source_section_refs` now lists the 4 target-package files |
| D2 | Codex | GAP | accepted | MemoryCoordinationTrace seed source was generic `(plan §6.4 seed)`; now also lists `13_Round_D` (primary) and `12_ABC` (supporting). | `seed-memorycoordinationtrace-and-final-proof-chain` | `source_section_refs` updated |
| D3-1 | Codex | GAP | accepted | SearchAffordance / safe-search preflight / NullResultNotice route control needs explicit crown-jewel identity. | new seed `seed-searchaffordance-safe-search-preflight-nullresultnotice-route-control` | new seeded row added |
| D3-2 | Codex | SUGGESTION | accepted | PromptShellRegistry / PromptShellVariant / PromptShellLearningContract is load-bearing for final-prompt proof. | new seed `seed-promptshellregistry-promptshellvariant-promptshelllearningcontract` | new seeded row added |
| D3-3 | Codex | SUGGESTION | accepted | IncidentObservation / FrictionEvent / FrictionPattern were implicit in the distinctions seed; now explicit. | `seed-assertion-cu-evidence-directive-procedure-issueframe-nullresult-...` (renamed) | seed name expanded to "Assertion / CU / Evidence / Directive / Procedure / IssueFrame / NullResult / IncidentObservation / FrictionEvent / FrictionPattern distinctions" |

## Status changes summary

- Rows added: 3 (one for `08_Coverage_Audit`, two new seeds: SearchAffordance + PromptShellRegistry). Inventory total: 110 → 113.
- Tier promotions: KDA / BDSM / DOC24 / DOC25 / DOC72 / DOC73 / EC Core / PropA / MULTIDOC files now get `crown_jewel_must_showcase` via filename detection (independent of section title). Tier distribution shifted: crown_jewel 52 → 73; load_bearing 37 → 19; important 21 (unchanged).
- Status changes: 5 proposal files moved from `operative_capability` → `aspirational_valuable` per architect nuance (preserved, not lost — `preservation_required = yes`).
- Owner fix: `DOC26 UnifiedWorkspaceLibrary` file now correctly tagged `DOC26`.

## No new Conflict Register entries

Will (architect) and Codex aligned on every finding once the architect nuance on proposal status was applied. No disputes to record in the Conflict / Disagreement Register at this stage.

## Next

Stage 3 patched and ready. Stage 4 (Supersession Matrix + Overlap Resolution + Aspirational Completion Register + Architect Decision Queue preload) is the next mandatory gate.