Elnor Repo Reader

09F_Final_Integration_Review_Prompt.md

Memory Rebuild Docs/Memory Rebuild Review Packs/DOC80_Memory_Control_Plane_PreSpec_Review_Pack_v1_0_2026-05-25/09F_Final_Integration_Review_Prompt.md

Generated 2026-06-09T01:23:58.539Z from commit dbaa25962edc11ab30e8d4ca1715f9ae5bf77331. Worktree: clean.

Open text page · Open raw txt · Open path URL

# Round F Prompt — Final Integration Review

## Assignment

Use this only after Rounds A–E have been adjudicated and the documents have been patched. This is the only omnibus review.

## Required attachments

All files in the patched review pack.

## Core question

Is the patched review pack coherent enough to draft the real DAMS V5 / Memory Control Plane spec and the separate Flatten-and-Unify execution plan?

## Issues to attack

1. Are terms used consistently across all documents?
2. Are any concepts duplicated under different names?
3. Are there remaining phantom seams?
4. Are owner boundaries clear enough for a spec drafter?
5. Do the worked examples still classify cleanly after patches?
6. Are research requirements carried into the spec outline and not left as prose?
7. Does the flattening plan target the architecture actually described in the concept model?
8. Is anything missing before drafting the operative spec?

## Required output

```text
1. Proceed / do not proceed disposition
2. Cross-document contradiction list
3. Remaining terminology fixes
4. Missing schemas/contracts
5. Missing fixtures
6. Final changes required before drafting DAMS V5
7. Final changes required before drafting Flatten-and-Unify Plan V2
```